Comments on: Board of Directors On-Line Meeting July 10, 2015

By: Phyllis Cavanaugh

Phyllis Cavanaugh — Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:27:46 +0000

Thank you! This adjourns the on-line meeting regarding the Crouch and Stanford ARRs which were both unanimously approved.

By: Joel Levin

Joel Levin — Sun, 12 Jul 2015 02:33:06 +0000

I vote yes for both the Stanford and the Crouch ARRs.

By: Louise Novak

Louise Novak — Sat, 11 Jul 2015 22:30:53 +0000

I vote yes for both the Stanford and Crouch ARR’s

By: Margaret

Margaret — Sat, 11 Jul 2015 20:20:37 +0000

I vote yes for both the Stanford and Crouch ARRs.

By: Adele Crouch

Adele Crouch — Sat, 11 Jul 2015 19:52:05 +0000

I vote yes for Stanford and abstain from Crouch.

By: Phyllis Cavanaugh

Phyllis Cavanaugh — Sat, 11 Jul 2015 19:20:58 +0000

Hi All,

We have a motion for approval and a second for each arr. I am now asking for a vote from the board. I vote yes for both.

Sincerely,

By: Joel Levin

Joel Levin — Sat, 11 Jul 2015 07:11:29 +0000

I would also add that I have no problems with the ARRs themselves (not surprising since the ARC recommended them unanimously).

By: Phyllis Cavanaugh

Phyllis Cavanaugh — Sat, 11 Jul 2015 04:31:04 +0000

Thank you!

This meeting is now open for any comments from community members before the board votes on the motions. Does anyone have any comments regarding the ARRs?

I will leave this open until tomorrow evening when I will call for a vote.

By: Louise Novak

Louise Novak — Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:08:23 +0000

Both ARR’s look good to me

By: Adele Crouch

Adele Crouch — Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:31:20 +0000

I have reviewed the Stanford ARR. I see nothing that does not comply with the CCR’s. It all looks good. I have no questions for Mr. Stanford.